Report Bugs

[Lex]

Whaddyamean with this? I'm having a hard time parsing this . I've put the css for the badges over in the messages template instead of extra.less, but, should move it over there.

Your original CSS only worked on chrome and idk why, so we basically have 3 copies of the same code each targeting a specific browser. I don't care but I thought you might for like... developeyness or whatever :3. So what I was saying is if you move the code to extra.less or change it to work on all browsers we can just delete the new code I put in extra.less.

 

[Cthulhu]

Sure.

Also, Xf supports LESS (or scss, I forget), which is a neat superset of css allowing e.g. nesting rules, which should reduce duplication.

 

[Lex]

Oh booming. Yeah basically I'm aware that having copies of code is bad practice so I was just saying if you move it or look into it/ change it at some point, that's where it is to be deleted if need be. But as I say I don't care one way or the other as long as I understand it and it works :3.

 

[Fangu]

pfffft LESS is for systems where people lets go of and bring in new consultants every 2 months and lose track of their CSS

/ hardcore
/ not relevant

 

[Claymore]

Just realised that Gaming and Entertainment are set to private for non-logged in users? I swear I could see them on the old forum without being logged in?

 

[Lex]

You're right. I'm going to fix that now

EDIT: I looked into it - it's resolved. It's partly because Xenforo sets "unregistered/ unconfirmed" users to "inherit" so I had to manually give that "group" the ability to "view threads by others" etc. Have a check for me? Checked it myself but always good to get confirmation.

 

[Mage]

Not sure if bug or not but on mobile I have to turn my phone landscape to log out because the little avatar icon isn't there on the top bar in the portrait layout.

 

[Lex]

Idk what that could be Mage, it should look like this in portrait:



The frame should be wrapping to the screen, unless there's some setting enabled. What browser and phone?

 

[Claymore]

You're right. I'm going to fix that now

EDIT: I looked into it - it's resolved. It's partly because Xenforo sets "unregistered/ unconfirmed" users to "inherit" so I had to manually give that "group" the ability to "view threads by others" etc. Have a check for me? Checked it myself but always good to get confirmation.

Yep, just checked, all fixed.

 

[Mage]

@ Lex: Nope, my avatar icon disappears. I'll take a screencap when I'm back on my phone and it's charged.

 

[Lex]

@Addy Carver what type of phone/ browser? Still got the iPhone/ using Safari?

 

[Mage]

Still shitty iPhone 4, iOS 9.5 something or other. I mean it's not a big deal, just doesn't make sense having it in one orientation and not the other.

 

[Radigar]

View attachment 1520

Still shitty iPhone 4, iOS 9.5 something or other. I mean it's not a big deal, just doesn't make sense having it in one orientation and not the other.

This isn't a real bug, thats the way how the XF template was built for work on all display resolutions. In Iphone 4 and 5 screens size at vertical orientation, the profile section will be compacted in the left menu:

 

[Lex]

Yeah, looks like it's a screen size thing rather than an issue with the theme, which is why you can see the avatar when it's in landscape.

 

[Cthulhu]

There's more than enough room for it though, and it's only that icon - there are no devices smaller than 325px wide. WICBA I'll see to smushing the distance between the icons a bit on smoller screens.

 

[X-SOLDIER]

Loosely related comment because of things that I do for my job: The 320 CSS pixel width is likely gonna be a common design parameter for responsive design standards as a minimum horizontal size, due to the WCAG 2.1 updates really focusing on that. So if you end up doing more designs, testing, and whatnot for mobile or responsive design on TLS or elsewhere, I'd expect to see that value popping up more and more in the near future (since WCAG 2.1 was just released this summer and isn't tied to any legal standards yet, but will likely start to replace WCAG 2.0 for that fairly soon).





X

 

[Cthulhu]

Thank f*dge I'm not a designer, 320px is not a lot to play with.

Then again, designers have it easy because they get to only make one pixel perfect ideal design while implementers have to try and make it work, and make it work in multiple resolutions. urgh. I'm going back to java

 

[CrashOuch]

I don't know if this is a bug or just my laptop being weird, so if it's not I'm really sorry!

But basically, when I click on a thread with New posts that has say an embedded tweet or something like that on the same page as the new post(s) (that seems to be what's causing it, anyway), the page initially loads to show the new post but then a moment later it jumps up to the embedded thing. This is happening to me pretty consistently but I can't think of a way of like ... showing you? It's not that big of a deal either, just a tiny bit annoying so I thought I should say something.

 

[X-SOLDIER]

I wonder if it's something with the browser taking a second to load in the embed, and then when that content loads afterwards, it moves focus to that, and pulls away from the new post.




X

 

[CrashOuch]

Could be!

I'll keep an eye out and make sure it does only happen when there are posts with shit embedded.

 

[CrashOuch]

Sorry to double post. It's done it again a couple times today. Just now in the XV thread, it jumped up to a post with a link in it, BUT it also went a little past it. I don't know if that makes sense, but you know how when it loads a new post, they're always right up flush with the top of the page, this one was just like randomly in the middle.

So, anyway, probably it's just my browser or something and I should stfu, right?

 

[X-SOLDIER]

I think I might've seen similar behaviour, so I'll see if I can try to be more attentive of it today & figure out if there's something specific causing it that I can figure out. Lemme know if you notice any other correlations.

EDIT: Yup, figured it out. It's that embedded content loads a little bit slower than the in-page anchoring, so it bumps the view away by however much the posts ABOVE the anchor change their size.



X

 

[CrashOuch]

Ooohhh!!! As long as that's all it is! Thanks for checking and stuff man

 

[X-SOLDIER]

Always happy to help out!!




X

 

[Cthulhu]

So it's just the page size changing after it's scrolled down to the newest post? That's annoying, probably also an issue for e.g. slow loading images and shit. I'm not sure how I'd fix that if I had to build something like that tbh.