No, A. You don't need to tell Vendel that. That's not your place.
On that point, calm down Vendel.
We can't control whether they join or not. So if you want to discuss their opinions or logic (or lack thereof, whatever your opinion may be) do so. But keep it civil and not just a blatant bashing of fandom.
If you all don't mind me saying...
...I kinda think its inevitable that some snark and "lulz" appear at one point or another. Let's be honest here; we're all human and we aren't perfect, still, I do believe that we can at least try not to make the lulz/mocking the center point of this debate/discussion. Instead, let's center on the arguments presented and call on the fallacies as we see them, backing up our views with proper evidence (which pretty much everyone here has proven that they can do). I have no problems (and I don't believe anyone should have, since people would debate directly with the CxA members if they came here or allowed debating on ther forums) in dissecting post and pointing out the errors/silliness/BS on THEIR arguments but without generalizing the comments to the people who posted those agumes either AS Cleriths or AS a particular fanbase. We know how their forums work and while we might not agree with the way they act or do things, I don't think we should do the same things they do and generalize about how they are as people, what they do with their time, etc, etc. It's not needed and, IMHO, it does create some avoidable bad blood and only weakens our arguments. Sure, they might do that, but do we need to do the same? After all, isn't that one of the major flaws of the arguments of the CxA forum peeps, just for starters (the whole CloTi generalization thing?)
Sure, the lulz are good and can ease up the seriousness a bit but, again, it shouldn't be the main focus here. If we resort to directly point fingers at specific individuals and name calling, then we'll simply giving them (and anyone else who thinks like them) a reason to disregard what we say and "hide" behind the "bully/victim/Clotis are mean" act. Frankly, if you were to ask me, Call me optimist but I believe an argument has a lot more impact if is straight to the point (because if that's the case, the person (s) involved in it will only have 2 possible choices: 1- Respond accordingly and back up their claims, with the same seriousness we have displayed or 2- Ignore the post, post opinion as evidence, etc, etc and only end up losing credibility/face. Either way, the point gets accross, IMHO.
Anyway, yeah, all of that to say that discussing the arguments themselves should be allowed and that people should come here to defend their points if they choose to. After all, they are free to do it at anytime time, right?
And now on to the real, important stuff... zeh discussion!
Did Cloud and Tifa know that Zack and Aerith were dating?
I kinda share Vendel's opinion on this one. I do believe Cloud and Tifa were (at most) aware that Aerith dated a member of SOLDIER but that's it. Otherwise I do believe the game would have make it more apparent/clear (remember the scene in Gongaga, if you have both Tifa and Aerith in the party and Zack's parents mention their missing son?)