First, I have some honest questions:
Does anyone honestly think it is not at all strange that SE told us how Cloud and Aerith's relationship changed between the FFVII and AC charts, but did not do the same for Cloud and Tifa?
Does anyone honestly think that if SE *officially* believes that Cloud and Tifa are *canon* by the time of AC, that they would use the same description for both the FFVII chart and AC chart (ie: "childhood friends")?
SE had the *perfect* opportunity to tell us how Cloud and Tifa's relationship changed between FFVII and AC. Yet, Cloud and Tifa are described as "childhood friends" in both charts. That, my friend, tells us a lot about SE and what their beliefs are (especially because they highlighted how Cloud and Aeith's relationship changed with the two charts)
Why would SE neglect the *canon* couples relationship transformation when they had the *perfect* opportunity to show this transformation?
......it just doesn't make sense............
--------------------
Hawkeye said:
If all that is so, DC's chart should still have some sort of description of them, yes? Some indication of where they stand one year after Advent Children, right? It doesn't have anything, though.
What specifically changed between AC and DC that should be highlighted in Cloud and Tifa's relationship chart?
And remember, I'm asking about their one-on-one relationship *only*.
Hawkeye said:
Why don't both charts for AC say "childhood friends" if emphasizing that is truly so important to SE?
Cloud and Tifa are listed as "childhood friends" in four charts. That's a pretty big emphasis on being "childhood friends", especially when one of the charts is referring to AC specifically, which is *after* the HAHW scene.
Hawkeye said:
And -- if these charts are meant to reflect a transition -- why don't the charts for BC, CC and LO say something other than "childhood friends"? Both of them had an established, inarguably canon romantic interest in one another at the time. Why is this not mentioned? Why is it just "childhood friends" even then?
If a relationship began as "childhood friends" and never moved beyond a friendship, why would there be a change in the relationship description?
Hawkeye said:
Why does Elena love Tseng on some FFVII charts and not others?
Do the charts reflect different time periods...?
Furthermore, Cloud and Tifa are described as "childhood friends" *consistently* in four charts when referring to their one-on-one relationship.
Applying an inconsistency about another couple to Cloud and Tifa is irrelevant. You have to explain how the inconsistency argument applies to each individual pairing. You can't simply dismiss official relationship charts simply because they are sometimes inconsistent. If the charts aren't directly inconsistent for Cloud and Tifa's relationship, they are still relevant for the LTD.
Hawkeye said:
You put too much weight in these charts that were obviously never meant to be scrutinized to this degree.
You are simply trying to dismiss official evidence that does not support Cloti.
Hawkeye said:
I also have to disagree that the charts always indicate the characters' beginning relationship to one another. In Cecil and Rosa's case, yes, "favors" is their beginning status. They were already in love with one another; they just hadn't expressed it yet. For them, their beginning status -- but not their ending status -- had a reflection.
1. I said the charts *typically* indicate the two characters relationship began.
For example, the FFVII chart tells us Cloud is Aerith's bodyguard. Then in the AC chart it tell us Cloud feels guilt for Aerith. We all know Cloud evolves beyond Aerith's bodyguard in FFVII, and we all know Cloud's guilt is removed by the end of AC. The point is -- the charts described the relationship Cloud had with Aerith based on how it began during the respective time periods, not how it ended up.
Using common sense and Cloud x Aerith as an example, it would seem that SE would also show how Cloud and Tifa's relationship *began* in both FFVII and AC. If Cloud and Tifa became romantic lovers after the HAHW scene, they should have been described as "lovers" in the AC chart. However, they are described as "childhood friends" in both the FFVII and AC charts.
SE had the *perfect* opportunity to tell us how Cloud and Tifa's relationship changed between FFVII and AC. Yet, Cloud and Tifa are described as "childhood friends" in both charts. That, my friend, tells us a lot about SE and what their beliefs are (especially because they highlighted how Cloud and Aeith's relationship changed with the two charts)
Why would SE neglect the *canon* couples relationship transformation when they had the *perfect* opportunity to show this transformation?
2. I'm unclear what you are saying about Cecil and Rosa. Could you explain it a different way?
Hawkeye said:
But in Zidane and Dagger's case? Tidus and Yuna's? They become an "important existence" to one another, sure, but they do not begin that way. Not even close to the beginning.
Do these couples have favor arrows? I'm genuinely curious.
Hawkeye said:
Likewise, Squall and Rinoa do not begin with "favors" applying to them. She doesn't fall for him until the end of the first disc when he saves her from the Iguions and says "Just stay close to me." Both Rinoa herself and the Ultimanias have pointed out that moment as the moment she fell in love with him.
I'm not talking about "favor" arrows. I'm talking about descriptions. These are two separate things.
To me, it seems likely that the description would indicate the beginning of a relationship, but that the favor arrows would also indicate mutual romance if present (side-note: Cloud and Tifa, the *canon* couple, have a total of *ZERO* favor arrows. Very, very, very...very...very strange)
Just because a chart describes the beginning of a relationship doesn't mean the favor arrows have to be describing the beginning of the relationship as well. They are two separate things that are telling us two separate things.
To put it another way, the charts are saying that this couple *began* here, but might have fallen in love depending on the presence or absence of favor arrows.
Why are you trying to compare two different things?
Hawkeye said:
The charts are just utterly inconsistent. Sometimes they point out beginning details (e.g. Cid being cruel to Shera). Sometimes they point out end-game details (e.g. Squall and Rinoa loving one another). Sometimes they do both, such as Steiner and Beatrix being described with "Rivals (later, favors)."
1. Was Cid listed as being cruel to Shera in a chart about FFVII *only* or a chart about the FFVII compilation? This makes a huge difference because Cid *was* mean to Shera in FFVII, but gets married to her after FFVII ends.
2. What is Squall and Rinoa's description? I understand they have favor arrows, but that's completely separate from the description.
Relationship descriptions =/= favor arrows.
FFVII chart =/= FFVII compilation chart.
The bottom line is: just because the relationship charts have inconsistencies does not mean they are inconsistent for *every* couple. You have to explain how the inconsistency argument applies *directly* to Cloud and Tifa because the fact is, SE has been very consistent when describing their relationship in particular (ie: "childhood friends" in *four* relationship charts).
And the fact that Cloud and Tifa are described as "childhood friends" in both the FFVII chart and the AC chart, when that would have been the perfect opportunity for SE to tell us that Cloud and Tifa evolved from friends to lovers, raises a H-U-G-E red flag.
--------------------
Both of these posts are intentionally misrepresenting what I said:
Your version of Aerith sounds like a cunt.
Also, no.
Ryushikaze said:
A prime example is BB's odd version of reality where Cloud and Tifa need Aerith's permission to progress in their relationship
I did not say that Cloud and Tifa *need* Aerith's permission. I said that *if* she had given Cloud permission to *love* Tifa, it would be clear evidence from SE that Cloud and Tifa are the *canon* couple.
Obviously Cloud and Tifa don't need Aerith's permission, but I was specifically comparing it to Celes x Locke.
Rachel tells Celes to move on and love Locke. That is clear evidence from SE that Celes x Locke are more canon than Celes x Rachel.
The other huge piece of canon proof that Celes x Locke have is that they are the *only* FFVI couple pictured on the "For The One I L-O-V-E" page. Cloud, however, is pictured on the "For The One I L-O-V-E" page with his two love interests in two canon scenes of romance.
Therefore, neither CxA or CxT have the clear-cut proof that Celes x Locke have. This means that although the love triangle for FFVI is solved, the love triangle for FFVII isn't.
--------------------
Danseru-kun said:
How come you insist they formed a family here? Where is the family in this passage? It's just said they want normal lives again and they'll find a way.
Cloud, Barret and Tifa are *talking* about forming a family together and discussing where their next home will be.
Cloud says, "let's go home" [that means everyone he's talking to]
Barret says, Where to?"
Cloud says, "our suspended reality"
Barret says, "what the hell do you mean by that?"
Cloud says, "our normal lives"
Barret says, "and where do *we* have something like that?"
Cloud says, "we'll find one" and then look at Tifa and says, "right?"
[Cloud is talking to Barret when he says, "we'll find one" and then looks at Tifa and says, "right?". This means Cloud is including both of them when he says, "We'll find one". It's not hard to comprehend that they are having a group discussion about finding a place to live *together*]
Then Marlene [who is Barret's daughter] says, “Yeah!”
Then Tifa nods and, "just like Barret, she wondered where *they* had a normal life."
["they" meaning Cloud, Tifa, Barret and Marlene]
How can you not understand that they are talking to each other about starting a new life *together*?
How do you not understand that they are talking about finding a place to call home *together*?
And if it wasn't already unequivocally clear that was what they were discussing, the next passage *CONFIRMS* that is what they were talking about:
"After visiting various locations with Tifa and Barret, Tifa opened the “Seventh Heaven” bar."
So the first passage I included talks about Cloud, Barret and Tifa finding a place to call home together. Then the second passage says that after Cloud looked at various locations with Tifa *AND* Barret, they settled on Seventh Heaven. Tifa then opened up the "Seventh Heaven" bar. This means all of them finally found a place to call home together -- the very thing they were all discussing in the first passage.
Then the next part of the second passage says,
"Before setting off on a journey, Barret left Marlene in Cloud and Tifa’s care, and the three of them began living together." ~FFVII 10th Anniversary Ultimania Cloud Strife Profile"
This means that although Barret is apart of the Seventh Heaven family that he helped form and create, he is not technically *living* with Cloud, Tifa and Marlene anymore because he is going on a "journey". Notice how it says Cloud, Tifa, and Marlene began *living* together as a family of three *after* Barret set off on his journey?
Therefore, all the quotes that talk about Cloud, Tifa, Marlene and Denzel *living* together are irrelevant. Barret doesn't live with them because he is on a journey, but that doesn't mean he isn't part of their family that he helped establish, create, and build. Period.
Danseru-kun said:
No this proves you ignore the quotes specifically mentioning members of Cloud's family and ignoring the fact that there is no single quote saying Barret is part of Cloud's family.
There is only *one* quote that excludes Barret from Cloud's family. But that quote completely ignores what is stated in the narrative.
Also -- I personally believe that quote specifies Tifa, Marlene, and Denzel because those were the family members living with Cloud at the Seventh Heaven who needed him the most, yet, were abandoned.
The bottom line is:
Multiple quotes calling them a *family* + narrative > one quote
PS: the quote you use as proof is describing a scene where Marlene is *holding* Barret's hand. Plus, if Marlene is Barret's daughter and she invites Cloud into *her* family, that means Cloud and Barret are in the same family.
Danseru-kun said:
This is Marlene's offer, not SE's perspective.
But SE included this dialogue for a reason. The same applies to Cait Sith's *wedding* prediction for Cloud x Aerith. Why would SE include a *wedding* prediction in the game if not to convey to the gamer that Cloud and Aerith are to be viewed romantically?
You can't always look at things so literally. You have to look at SE's intent.
Danseru-kun said:
“I’ll take care of Cloud and Tifa!”
Barret turned round and shouted, “Do your best!” His voice was a little shaky. “Unite the family’s strength and keep at it!”~CoT
-> It would help not to omit the whole picture.
“I’ll be a nice child of this family!” Marlene said.
Hearing those words, Cloud and Tifa looked at each other. A child of this family
“I’ll take care of Cloud and Tifa!”
Barret turned round and shouted, “Do your best!” His voice was a little shaky. “Unite the family’s strength and keep at it!”~CoT
The full context actually doesn't change the meaning.
What Barret is saying to Marlene is to keep the family that he helped establish *together* while he is gone.
This implies that because he is leaving, the family will not be whole, which is why Marlene needs to help keep it together.
Danseru-kun said:
After Cloud thanked Marlene’s innocent offer with his serious face, he looked at Tifa. Tifa nodded a little. Would there be various problems arising after this? However, Tifa decided that she would stop worrying about the relationship between the two of them.
This doesn't say what *type* of relationship Cloud and Tifa have between them. And obviously they are going to have some sort of relationship by virtue of being the only two adults that live at Seventh Heaven. Luckily, Coud has a separate room with a bed in it to escape from Tifa.
And living together doesn't mean a *romantic* relationship. Cid and Shera lived together but weren't in a romantic relationship during FFVII. However, Cid and Shera eventually get *married* -- something Cloud and Tifa never do.
Living together =/= romantic relationship.
Marriage = romantic relationship
Danseru-kun said:
It doesn't hurt Cloti if Barret did establish the family.
Yes it does.
The way it is presented by Cloti's is that Cloud and Tifa started a family together that does not include Barret. Obviously this helps build the case for Cloud and Tifa because why else would two people start a family together if they weren't romantically involved?
The *obvious* insinuation is that if Cloud and Tifa started a family together by themselves, they must therefore be in a romantic relationship. That is the obvious insinuation that is being pushed by Cloti's when they try to say that Cloud and Tifa started a family together without Barret.
But the fact is, Barret *IS* apart of their family. He helped create it and his daughter is apart of it.
The bottom line is: Cloud and Tifa did *not* start a family together by themselves, they started it with Barret and Barret's daughter, Marlene.
--------------------
That being said, however, I still fail to see the importance in proving/disproving Cloud and Tifa being together romantically because of this. While Marlene will always consider Barret as her father, Denzel still considers Cloud and Tifa as his adoptive parents. I believe we need to keep that in mind.
1. Cloti's are trying to give off the impression that, "Cloud and Tifa are obviously in a romantic relationship because they formed a family together and are raising children together, therefore they are in a romantic relationship because that's what romantic couples do!"
Essentially, by removing Barret from the Seventh Heaven family, it helps build up the idea that Cloti is canon because it gives off the impression that Cloud x Tifa are similar to a married couple raising children. But this ignores Barret's participation in forming and creating the family, and it also ignores his role as Marlene's father.
2. Everyone in AVALANCHE is dead (and Barret is away on a journey), which means there are only two people for Denzel to consider his parents by default — Cloud and Tifa.
And, again, I will stress that Barret wasn't shown in Cloud's little group of people whom he cherishes most. If Barret is part of the Seventh Heaven family, then why isn't he shown alongside Zack, Aerith, Tifa, Marlene, and Denzel? I am genuinely curious about this.
^ I would love for the aforementioned above to be addressed. ^
Just because Cloud's one-on-one relationship with Barret isn't as close as Cloud's one-on-one relationship with Tifa, Aerith, and the *children*, doesn't really mean anything, IMO. This quote is talking about who is important to Cloud, not who is in his family.
Furthermore, this quote mentions Aerith, who is not apart of the Seventh Heaven family. This means that this quote is simply telling us who is important to Cloud, not who is apart of the Seventh Heaven family.
The fact is, one of the people mentioned is Marlene. Marlene is *Barret's* daughter. And again -- it makes complete sense that Cloud's most important people would be his two love rivals Aerith and Tifa, in addition to the *children*
As for the whole bedroom arrangement thing...whether or not Barret is staying at Seventh Heaven, again, doesn't, by any means, disprove whether or not Cloud's sharing a room with Tifa. I daresay too much emphasis has been made over that little cot in Cloud's office.
Relevant questions regarding Cloud's bed:
1. Given the circumstances of Midgar at that time, it doesn't surprise me that Cloud doesn't have a properly furnished room. But the lack of other furniture is irrelevant and beside the point.
2. How does a lack of furniture prevent someone from sleeping in a bed?
3. Who else sleeps in that bed if not Cloud?
4. Did SE really include a "guest bed" for the hell of it?
5. Until we see Cloud and Tifa sleeping together, it is only reasonable to assume Cloud sleeps in the bed that is in his room.