Did he? I'll have to go back and look for his response. I'm sorry if I did not respond to it, Tres. I didn't see it.
The post, literally immediately above yours.
This post
How did you miss it? I'm tempted to quote it all at you just for emphasis.
I didn't say that at all. I specifically said that Cloud and Tifa DO reveal their feelings for one another in the High Affection version of the Highwind scene. But I also said that only happens on an optional basis.
But Cloud wanting Tifa by his side, them forming a family together, them having a future together, none of that is optional.
And revealing their feelings for each other is what happens, period. If that only happens in the high version, then merely the high version is canon.
It is also optional for Cloud and Tifa to share mutual feelings of disinterest for each other romantically in the Low Affection version of the Highwind scene. SE clearly said that the Low Affection version is possible, and that it is one of two conditions in the Highwind scene:
Deviation - Two versions of the conversation before the final battle
Prior to the final battle, the contents of the conversation between Cloud and Tifa can change depending on the degree of Tifa's affection. If the degree of affection is high, the contents of the two's conversation will involve deep subject matter and strong feelings for each other. As well, the sight of the two seen by their companions the next morning will lead to an embarrassing scene for Tifa, and she blushes greatly. ~page 232, Final Fantasy 20th Anniversary Ultimania
Yes, a deviation. Not a declaration that there's no official version, but a noting that there's more than one way a scene can turn out. As the examples of Shadow and Tidus should once again show, scene deviations do not prevent official versions of that deviation from existing. And no, that does not saying anything about 'mutual feelings of disinterest' that is something you have made up. As both Balthea and OWD have pointed out, you're being very silly here. The affection value is purely a game mechanic. It raises and lowers for entirely arbitrary reasons, and does not change Cloud at all. Cloud is static in the AV game. Likewise, even when Tifa's AV is low, her interest in Cloud doesn't change. And 'feelings of disinterest' is kinda oxymoronic in its own right.
Even if this line of thinking was true, how does one go from 'mutually confirmed feelings of disinterest for each other' to 'Cloud feels he can succeed at his new life where previously he had failed because this time he will have Tifa by his side in a different way that before' How does mutual disinterest lead to the two of them deciding to form a family together, raise children together, and have a future together? 'Mutual disinterest' does not logically follow with the rest of the compilation.
I see a clear statement that there are TWO versions of the conversation before the final battle. I also see a clear statement that the contents of the conversation between Cloud and Tifa can change according to the degree of Tifa's affection.
I see nothing about one version of the conversation being canon.
If the conversation has two versions, then the conversation is optional.
By this logic, Shadow neither officially lived or died and the same goes for Tidus.
If you take it that way, I'm sorry - but that is your problem, not mine.
No, Aly, it's still very much your problem. You're the one making the case against the opposition rather than the case for your own position. Even if you invalidate the claims of others, your claims are not validated as a result.
Yes, I am claiming that a relationship between the living and the dead is possible in a fantasy game where a dead man has come alive to battle the living on two different occasions.
Sephiroth survived the first time. He's only come back once, and doing so was a perversion of the highest order to the ideals of the dead woman you say has a romance with the living.
I'm claiming that a relationship between the living and the dead is possible in a fantasy game where a dead man summons a Meteor to destroy the Planet.
Again, he wasn't dead at that point. And even if he was, he quite literally had a living servant do the grunt work for him.
I'm claiming that a relationship between the living and dead is possible in a fantasy game where a member of an extinct species finds a wife of the same extinct species and has several children.
Red XIII being the last of his kind has always been an assumption. Bugen was always certain he'd find another.
I'm claiming a relationship is possible between the living and dead in a fantasy game where the Planet produces several Weapons to defeat Jenova.
But none of that automatically translates to the dead and the living being able to consistently and regularly converse.
Also, Vendel had a point. If it's possible between alive and dead, why not two dead people?
Guess what? Fantastic things happen in that game.
Fantastic things happen in Final Fantasy IV, but Gilbart doesn't get to make sweet love to Anna's ghost. Rydia's mom doesn't get to come back for fireside chats with her daughter. Cecil's dad can only make make a ghostly voice appear, and his mom's shit outta luck entirely.
Fantastic things happen in FF8, but Raine is still dead.
Fantastic things happen in FF13, but Sazh's wife does not come back.
Fantasy does not automatically mean it is possible for the dead and the living to freely interact. Again, this is something you need to support can happen regularly. Then you need to explain why despite it being possible, it does not happen more often, why in the present case, it takes two years to happen. You need to demonstrate first that it's possible, then that it's actual. This includes making a primary case for the romance when it was between two living people.
The same game has Vincent stay in love with Lucrecia, who is, by the way, dead. I see the word "Love" written next to a picture of Cloud and Aerith in a commercial for FFVII:
Lucrecia isn't dead. She actually can't die.
If we're going with that commercial, whose hate always was? Commercials are not trustworthy sources of information. While they CAN contain accurate information, they can also contain entirely INaccurate information as well, and are not reliable sources in the slightest. Unless you think Tina has visited Tokyo or Mog is responsible for all the monsters in FFVI, then you'll agree with me that the information in commercials must be rated for accuracy against the source material. It is not authoritative on its own.
Also, EFUCKGADS no WONDER your post was moderated. That image tag had like three pages of junk nonsense included in it.
There's no reason for SE to put the word "Love" over a picture of Cloud and Aerith if they aren't in love. Furthermore, the voice over saying, "the story of a love that could never be" would mean that FFVII is a story about the love of Cloud and Aerith.
There's no reason to show Tina riding a Magitek armor around Tokyo if she never did it. There's no reason to show Mog having auditions for monsters if he didn't bring them into the game. Etc. etc.
Look, the FFVIII commercial got it wrong too. Your argument here is based on MARKETING MATERIALS. The stuff that exists to sell you the product, not inform you of its content.
Although Cloti's often say that the phrase
"a love that could never be" means that the love can never exist, it's been verified for us at allexperts.com that the phrase is actually talking about a love that exists despite circumstances that would normally prevent it. Here's a link to their answer:
http://en.allexperts.com/q/General-Writing-Grammar-680/Meaning-phrase.htm
No, A love that can never be- and this is granting arguendo that the love discussed is mutual- is one that is prevented from actually happening. That's what happened to Romeo and Juliet. Their love couldn't be and it was undone. They both bit it at the end of the play. Incidentally, this is a phrase that does not appear in the body of the play at all. I've also seen it used in other forms, where a low class woman regretted that her love for an upperclass man could never be because of societal issues. It's not always discussing people already in love, though I do not deny it can be. This is a common problem, I fear. Many times, your points, and those of your fellow Cleriths are not quite addressing the points and arguments raised by those you debate with, but ones slightly or materially different than them. I don't think anyone is actually saying it's 'prevented from ever being love,' we're saying 'it's prevented from ever being practically realized.' And if it is capable, then it's not a love that can never be, which kinda makes bringing the commercial a bad move for you. If the love can never be, then it can't be recognized post mortem.
But again, it is commercial, so I guess you think Tina Branford really DID visit Tokyo in the mid 90s in a Magitek Armor and Mog really was responsible for Zapping monsters in the FF3us game cart. [facetiousexcitement]MAYBE THE TWO ARE RELATED![/facetiousexcitement]
Nojima wrote a story about the same game where fantastic things happen in which Aerith calls Cloud her koibito (boyfriend/sweetheart/lover.) Nojima also wrote a story about the same game where he said the premise of the story was to show that problems would exist between Cloud and Tifa even without Geostigma and Sephiroth, and that he wasn't certain they'd be able to solve those problems after AC/ACC.
Yes, and? No one here is expecting rainbow sunshine farts from the relationship. He also said he hadn't wanted to get into his thoughts on love and marriage in the novella, then laughed to indicate he had. He also said that with the kids they probably could.
What you seem to ignore on this page of the 20th Anniversary Ultimania:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v91/PhoenixStar/20thAU-LoveBetweenHeroes.jpg
Is that there are
TWO pictures of Cloud on that page. One of those pictures shows Cloud with Aerith, the other shows Cloud with Tifa.
BOTH pictures are under the title "For the One I Love".
BOTH pictures are under a caption saying that romantic love develops between the heroes of the games.
BOTH pictures are labeled as having optional versions with a Deviation sidebar.
FFVII is the
ONLY Final Fantasy game on that page with two pictures of the hero with two different girls.
And that's why we look at the text on the page. Consult the greater context of the information that we have already established. The pictures tell us little. apart from when these take place. The text tells us the what, the salient details. It tells us the date can happen multiple ways, but that the high highwind results in mutual feelings. By context, these are of romance.
There is a separate category or box on that page about non-romantic love, so neither picture belongs to that category.
Yes, I'm aware. If you will actually pay attention, I don't deny that the date scenes are all about romance. 3 of the four are the girls trying to make a move and the fourth is Barret accusing Cloud of making one (Insert Yaoi overtones here). I just note that Cloud is officially utterly oblivious of the feelings for Tifa and Aerith during these moments, and that he makes no romantic overtures here. Contrast to the Night under the highwind, where romantic feelings are mutually confirmed. period. End of. And that this scene occurs after Cloud and Tifa become aware of the feelings the other holds.
Therefore, that page is actually saying that it is possible for Cloud to love either woman, and who Cloud loves is OPTIONAL to the player. It is NOT saying that one couple is canon and the other is not
No. At most it's saying he can love both women. But not either. Because one of those statements is not conditional. It's not conditional on the information page either. You keep ignoring the example of Shadow's possible demise, but deviations do not prevent a canon outcome. Tres covered this. I covered this. You keep ignoring it because you don't want to face it.
You want a case for CloudxAerith, fine. You'll find one here:
http://clerith.heliohost.org/ClerithEssay.htm
I will only discuss this essay with you and/or Tres and Discord if you continue discussing with me the subject of whether or not Cloti is canon. You may wonder about Cloud and Aerith, but I wonder about the legetimacry of your claim that Cloti is canon.
'legetimacry?' I assure you, there's nothing wrong with the legetimacry of the claim. Why the legetimacry is a finely honed political body. And I know you wonder about the legitimacy of what I say, but even without this page, the case for C/T is quite a lot stronger than the case for C/A. Heck, deciding to kill off a character involved in a romantic triangle is a classic way of ending the triangle. It's even tradition in Japanese literature!
I don't want one of your essays, Anastar, especially since referencing your site or any other site is currently expressly verboten in this singular thread and by the current no excuses tolerance policy, you should be threadbanned for posting that. I want you to, on the fly, here in this thread, present the evidence to make your case. If your case is strong, it should be no problem.
Anastar, I've heard that you said you came here to make an example to those who were complaining about debates. Well, you're certainly giving us an example, but it's probably not the one you were hoping to set.
@CR, I await your response. As far as the game goes, I for one will not look down on you for pirating a ten year old out of print PC game if you cannot afford its purchase, though that you've played CC indicates you have the console to actually get the game legitimately for cheap. I do stress that actually engaging the game as much as you can will unveil so much more about the total context of the story than simply reading or even watching bits and pieces can.