NOTE: If anyone wants me to respond to their posts, I won't respond unless you send me your post in PM. I posted that long ago, but I guess some of you don't know about it.
Oh, we KNOW about it. But we also know your reasons for requesting it amount to nonsense, since A: you have absolutely no problem responding to posts on your own forum B: You don't fully respond to the posts that ARE PMed to you, and C: Even what you do respond to, you don't really read.
Tres
Tres. I'm Anastar. I remember you accusing me of lies, yes. Thing is, those "lies" are all in your imagination. Hey, if you think I've lied to you - it's your problem, not mine.
No, it's still YOUR PROBLEM. Because it's not just him who's caught you lying. You might want to consider, y'know, proving you're not lying, quote mining, and distorting the record.
Hmmm... let's look at what you actually said:
By the way, take your time responding to these and the three previous posts I sent. There's no need to rush, and I'd rather you just wait to get to them all at once. ~Tres, PM on Oct. 27
I see nothing specifically saying that I should respond to your PMs all at once. To me, your PM says not to rush because I can respond to it all at once if I want to.
And his PM doesn't say that you can do it if you want to. That phrase doesn't appear. His PM says he'd prefer you waited and do it all at once.
He's saying NOW he didn't want you to wait.
So you're revealing yourself to be inconsiderate of the requests of others.
Why, again, should we be considerate of yours if you won't extend that same courtesy?
If you see it that way, you see it that way. Frankly, I think the situation is the reverse. The only poor and/or dishonest debating tactics I see in this thread is on the Cloti side of the fence. But whatever...
If you see poor and dishonest debating tactics, please, do call them out and explain why they're poor.
Explain as completely as you can why they're poor. Do it here, in this thread. Name names and use specific examples. I even DARE you.
Probably because I've yet to see any argument from me invalidated. I've seen a few things I've said argued against - but invalidated? No.
"There's no door in that picture."
"There's a TV in Cloud's Office."
"Chair."
If you don't think these- especially that first one- are invalidated, what are you smoking, and have you considered not smoking it?
Mostly, however, I just see insults thrown at me in an apparent effort to evade responding to me.
You know what I see, Anastar? You claiming that you're being insulted in an effort to evade responding to you.
I'll even cop to the insults and call you three more, but I will be DAMNED if I'll let you say we are insulting you INSTEAD of responding to you. We might be insulting you, but the record will show we are RESPONDING as well.
Seeing as how I haven't brought it up to you before, I don't see why not.
Once again, Anastar, we ARE capable of cross reference.
No, actually I was going to ask why they're being described as "childhood friends" when you're claiming that SE has validated them as a couple?
Same Reason Wakka and Lulu are.
And meanwhile, you're going to avoid the question and retreat into supposed parallels with other couples from other Final Fantasies.
He's not avoiding the question at all. His point was to show the question is INVALID.
There's one big, major difference between CidxShera, DaggerxZidane, LuluxWakka, and Cloud and Tifa. The difference is that CidxShera, DaggerxZidane, and LuluxWakka have been confirmed as couples on a non-optional basis. This is not true of Cloud and Tifa, and that's why they are the supposed "exception".
However, the point does remain- even setting aside whether or not Cloud and Tifa are non-optionally confirmed or not- that even confirmed couples are referred to in terms other than couple-hood in these flowcharts, including using the same phrase Cloud and Tifa are referred to by. That they are refered to by this phrase no more prevents their being canon than it does Wakka and Lulu.
Focus on the commercial? I don't think so. After all, I gave you a whole essay about supporting evidence for CloudxAerith:
http://clerith.heliohost.org/ClerithEssay.htm
An essay which contains very little evidence and a whole hell of a lot of 'Maybes, ifs, coulds', a bevy of quotemines, quotes divorced from contexts, meanings plucked from thin air, etc.
I still demand that you do me the simple fucking courtesy of reading my response.
That essay is 6,980 words long. The total amount of words in that essay about the commercial is 247. That means that there are 6,733 words in the essay about evidence other than the commercial. So is the commercial a focus? Hardly.
In this thread, you have used that commercial as evidence on multiple occasions, across several weeks. I believe it's come up unbidden on no less than three occasions. Yes, it's a focus for you.
Plus, you're trying to get me to defend CloudxAerith, which I consider simply another evasion tactic from you.
"Asking me to support my own position is an evasion tactic"
Nope, can't even be civil about this one- that's fucking stupid.
I've already said I'm here to discuss ONE thing:
The TLS article about "This Just In: The Love Triangle Debate - Over" is nothing but your opinion. There is no confirmation from SE that Cloud and Tifa are the official couple of FFVII. The FTOIL page is saying that CloudxTifa as well as CloudxAerith are optional, which is why BOTH women are shown on the FTOIL page with Cloud and why BOTH are specified as optional.
Because they are not specified as optional. Because you yourself HAVE admitted that Listed Deviations can have Canon Outcomes AND that these Canon Outcomes can be Specified in Ultimanias.
When it was pointed out to you THAT you agreed to this, you added more Ad Hoc conditions onto the argument.
I know you disagree - but I say it again because you should NOT be claiming that your opinion is fact when it has not been validated by SE.
It's not our opinion. The page says Mutual romantic confirmation happens. It says nothing as to which version it happens in. It merely says IT HAPPENS. P232 also says IT HAPPENS. This is what you're failing to grasp.
And you seem to ignore the fact that I do not care what you think about CloudxAerith. I've never claimed that CloudxAerith are canon. You are free to your opinion about CloudxAerith.
And now you have lied to an extent that you cannot wriggle out of. Anastar, do you think we've forgotten the past 15 years of this debate overnight?
Incidentally, this IS an evasion of Tres's point- If a love can never be- IT CAN NEVER BE- thus the option for C/A is impossible, therefore your claims of a relationship at any point are completely impossible.
And then it just turns into an 'Anyone but Tifa!' argument again.
You are also free to your opinion about CloudxTifa. However, you should recognize it as opinion instead of proclaiming it as fact. SE is the only one who can say which couple is canon, and they have yet to do so.
They have, though. Not explicitly enough for you, perhaps, but through their words, actions, and considerations in shaping the post FF7 narrative, they showed Cloud and Tifa together.
And that's how they showed all the other canon couples before the FTOIL page. Being together.
There's only one marriage among heroes in all FFdom. The rest are merely 'together.' That's how S-E shows it.
The "koibito" quote in the Reunion Files only says that Tifa is LIKE a mother and LIKE a koibito. She's not really a mother, is she? She's just LIKE one. So, she's not really a sweetheart, either.
If the Japanese was not three distinct clauses, this MIGHT possibly apply. If the english didn't also say Tifa was 'ally in battle' it also might apply.
How is Tifa 'like an ally in battle' Anastar?
For the record, the Japanese simply says tifa IS a koibito/ beloved/ someone's sweetheart.
Furthermore, there's nothing even hinting that it has anything to do with Cloud. Cloud's name isn't used in the sentence. You're just assuming it's in reference to Cloud.
And you're 'assuming' COLW has anything to do with Aerith. Aerith's name isn't used in the novella.
Keep ignoring the fact that I provided plenty of other examples from FFVII's developers that provide evidence for CloudxAerith.
Except not. You posted things that you extruded a glimmer of Clerith possibility from then waved around like a flag.
All because I'm saying that SE has left the LT up to interpretation, and that SE has yet to declare either Cloti or Clerith canon. All because I dare to disagree with your opinion. Go figure.
You're only saying that recently. And you're only saying it because you know you've 'lost,' and you don't want anyone else to 'win'
Cloud hears Tifa's heart call to him in both versions, Celes. What's different is that Tifa's lines get Cloud talking and trying to speak up about his own feelings, after which the 'words aren't the only way' line comes up.
But really, it's pointless.
Yes, HAHW is optional in the game.
So is shadow's death, Tidus's ressurection, Terra rejoining the party, etc. etc. etc.
We're still told what the fuck happened in all cases. Optionality in game does not prevent canonicity in narrative.