SPOILERS LTD Remake — It's like New Coke except ... no, it's exactly like New Coke

Hellenic

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Hellenic
There is no point. They don't even like Aerith. They just like the idea they've built up in their heads.

They have to portray Cloud so much as the ultimate asshole on earth to make their ship work and make sense with the official material that's it's impossible to look me in the eye and assure me that there's no problem with this kind of guy being the right man for their favorite FF girl.

Someone who uses his childhood friend sentimental distress to steal a kiss because he wants to get back at Aerith for still having feelings for Zack, or who decides to ghost a woman for 1 year after forcing a dependent child on her, is supposed to be Prince Charming for your princess? Don't make me laugh.

They don't care about FF7. They don't care about the characters. They just want their stupid ship.
Begs to question why would they even care about the ship to begin with? If they just want to self insert as Aerith then why would anyone want to be in a ship with Cloud to begin with?

I never quite understand why people want to be so passionate about this ship to go as far as make the characters just the absolute worst as a side effect.
 

abzy1200

Pro Adventurer
There has been times were non clerith fans have made claims that are based on their opinions or interpretations and not get as much flak. As someone who stubbles in here once and awhile while searching for someone on Google, you guys really don’t make an effort to make it inclusive to other interpretations of the very ambiguous narrative.
Yet again, the LTD isn't ambiguous, you just have to work for the answer. The devs have always been like that.

If Cloud living happily ever while raising a child with Tifa isn't "proof" then I don't know what is.

and again, I also think Clotis can make wild, unreasonable claims. I'm a fan of Cloti but I'm also a fan of the truth.
 

Suffi

Lv. 25 Adventurer
AKA
suffibi
I don’t like these shipper labels to begin with. They’re like political parties. None of us should have to answer for the fringe just because we agree on a single topic.
This is how I feel. Instead being like ‘oh clerith this or oh clotis that.’ It should be just ‘this extremist shipper believes this thing.’ Healthy debates and discussing differencing opinions should be encouraged.
 

Ryushikaze

Deus Admiral Parsimonious, PHD, DDS, MD, JD, OBE
AKA
Tim, Ryu
There has been times were non clerith fans have made claims that are based on their opinions or interpretations and not get as much flak. As someone who stubbles in here once and awhile while searching for someone on Google, you guys really don’t make an effort to make it inclusive to other interpretations of the very ambiguous narrative.
Respectfully, the narrative is not ambiguous. The man has been harboring feelings for one woman his entire life, admits those feelings, confirms those feelings with that woman the night before the possible end of the world, begins his new life with her the morning after averting the end of the world, moves in with her, adopts a child with her, is happy with her, so happy he feels guilty about it (Because why did his friends have to die for him to have his happiness), and then yes, he becomes consumed with depression and guilt when he contracts a fatal wasting disease and removes himself from her, but as a form of penance, and even then he's still looking for a cure for his new son and himself. And the moment that he's cured, he moves back in with the woman, and when another crisis happens a year later he proactively takes steps to protect his family from it and then rides into battle with that woman to protect and reclaim their new home.

Is the ambiguity that he might have caught feelings for a woman he knew two weeks?

Because even if he did, it's clear where his heart has always lay and where he decides to go.
 

LunarTarotGirl

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Lunarae
There has been times were non clerith fans have made claims that are based on their opinions or interpretations and not get as much flak. As someone who stubbles in here once and awhile while searching for someone on Google, you guys really don’t make an effort to make it inclusive to other interpretations of the very ambiguous narrative
Of course they have. And I have in the past ripped those arguments to shreds as well. Just not here.

Because no one here really insists they are the arbiters of the narrative and are the only ones that know everything. At least as far as I've seen.

But as you see my posts I have given my view and interpretation several times and not everyone has agreed with everything I have said nor have I with them but they didn't just shut me down either.

But a debate is about evidence first and foremost and proving a claim with evidence and reasoning not really interpretation.

It's not interpretation that is being argued against here.

You can have your interpretation and discuss your thoughts.
But if you want to make a claim there needs to be some evidence and you need to be fair about that evidence.

And that actually has nothing to do with interpretation because the evidence we find can go against our original interpretation.

The problem is people not wanting to admit that.

Edit: Even as a CA just to be clear I'm not interested in sides as much as I am in fairness. If an argument is unfair or evidence is erroneous I'm going to point it out. Regardless. And I think this is only fair.
 
Last edited:

Suffi

Lv. 25 Adventurer
AKA
suffibi
Respectfully, the narrative is not ambiguous. The man has been harboring feelings for one woman his entire life, admits those feelings, confirms those feelings with that woman the night before the possible end of the world, begins his new life with her the morning after averting the end of the world, moves in with her, adopts a child with her, is happy with her, so happy he feels guilty about it (Because why did his friends have to die for him to have his happiness), and then yes, he becomes consumed with depression and guilt when he contracts a fatal wasting disease and removes himself from her, but as a form of penance, and even then he's still looking for a cure for his new son and himself. And the moment that he's cured, he moves back in with the woman, and when another crisis happens a year later he proactively takes steps to protect his family from it and then rides into battle with that woman to protect and reclaim their new home.

Is the ambiguity that he might have caught feelings for a woman he knew two weeks?

Because even if he did, it's clear where his heart has always lay and where he decides to go.
Here a problem … you are assuming by me saying it’s ambiguous narrative that I’m talking about Advent Children and the novels. Kind of seems you are thinking I’m a Clerith shipper who doesn’t view that Tifa and Cloud are living under on house together in separate rooms. Which I wasn’t. I more thinking about Rebirth and Cloud’s and Aerith’s interactions. That whole ‘like-like’ speech I have read shippers dissecting that scene to no end. Also the ‘dream date’ being hotly debated as a Zack dream date when we know that Nojima loves to reference previous written scenes, like a lot and there really isn’t any hidden meaning to it. I hope we can all agree that the dream date was mostly a set up to display how choices don’t matter against fate.
 

Hellenic

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Hellenic
Cloud, the main character, can only have his story work if Cloti exists, so no, this isn't a case of "ff7 isn't about romance."

The sub-plot of this game is Cloud's identity issues, which is a plotline that can only exist if Cloti does.
This right here. The game isn't necessarily a romance game persay, but the romantic sub-plot exists and is a key element to Clouds character and it's specifically there with Tifas character.
 

LunarTarotGirl

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Lunarae
Here a problem … you are assuming by me saying it’s ambiguous narrative that I’m talking about Advent Children and the novels. Kind of seems you are thinking I’m a Clerith shipper who doesn’t view that Tifa and Cloud are living under on house together in separate rooms. Which I wasn’t. I more thinking about Rebirth and Cloud’s and Aerith’s interactions. That whole ‘like-like’ speech I have read shippers dissecting that scene to no end. Also the ‘dream date’ being hotly debated as a Zack dream date when we know that Nojima loves to reference previous written scenes, like a lot and there really isn’t any hidden meaning to it. I hope we can all agree that the dream date was mostly a set up to display how choices don’t matter against fate.
Before you say this.
Please go back a few pages and you'll see so many people here have different reads of the date. Nowhere did everyone unanimously agree it was Aerith forcing Cloud into Zack's role or even recreation of the CC date. Some think so, some don't. And yes there was a whole conversation about the choices and fate and what it could mean. There was a variety of topics and opinions discussed. And literally no one was shut down for it. We all made claims and discussed our evidence. We either agreed or disagreed.

This place isn't the hive mind you may think.
 

Rin

Pro Adventurer
There has been times were non clerith fans have made claims that are based on their opinions or interpretations and not get as much flak. As someone who stubbles in here once and awhile while searching for someone on Google, you guys really don’t make an effort to make it inclusive to other interpretations of the very ambiguous narrative.
Most people here don't hate Clerith fans at all but not many Clerith fans want to engage in a healthy, respectful "debate" that actually takes the entire game narrative into account. A lot of the time their evidence is just cherry-picked quotes, taking scenarios out of context, or providing bad faith arguments.

You can't really have a conversation with people like that cause they're basically plugging their ears and screaming over you.

There are two Clerith fans in here that are well respected amongst us, so I think it's pretty unfair to say this place only targets Clerith interpretations. Also, "neutral" opinions do come up here a lot as well, it's just that "neutral" opinions happen to be wholly aligned with bad faith Clerith talking points.

Also the ‘dream date’ being hotly debated as a Zack dream date when we know that Nojima loves to reference previous written scenes, like a lot and there really isn’t any hidden meaning to it. I hope we can all agree that the dream date was mostly a set up to display how choices don’t matter against fate.
This, I find a little disingenuous. The dream date is considered a "Zack date" because at every stall you go to there's Zack AND Cloud coded merchandise. If you choose any of the Cloud coded stuff, Aerith will immediately choose the Zack coded stuff. But a lot of people here don't think it's a 1:1 recreation of Aeriths date with Zack while others do.

The dream date is also running in parallel with Zack scenes; when Aerith talks about her favourite place/a place of memories, we immediately cut to Zack sitting on the church steps. This is not ambiguous. This is literally how cinematic storytelling works.

Yes, the dream date is there to tell us that "no matter what you choose, you can't fight fate/destiny" but that message is tightly tied to Zack's storyline of fighting against fate and taking control of his own narrative. Divorcing the two from each other and claiming "ambiguity" is a major disservice to the story at large, imo.
 

nars305

🎵 I am so, so bored 🎶
Here a problem … you are assuming by me saying it’s ambiguous narrative that I’m talking about Advent Children and the novels. Kind of seems you are thinking I’m a Clerith shipper who doesn’t view that Tifa and Cloud are living under on house together in separate rooms. Which I wasn’t. I more thinking about Rebirth and Cloud’s and Aerith’s interactions. That whole ‘like-like’ speech I have read shippers dissecting that scene to no end. Also the ‘dream date’ being hotly debated as a Zack dream date when we know that Nojima loves to reference previous written scenes, like a lot and there really isn’t any hidden meaning to it. I hope we can all agree that the dream date was mostly a set up to display how choices don’t matter against fate.
I’m sorry I’m not understanding.

Are you saying you are only currently discussing Rebirth and setting aside the fact that we are shown where Cloud and Tifa end up?

I see you have an interpretation of these specific Aerith scenes, and I won’t say I disagree with them, it’s just that I viewed them differently. I also see them as isolated moments in a much bigger picture.
 

abzy1200

Pro Adventurer
Here a problem … you are assuming by me saying it’s ambiguous narrative that I’m talking about Advent Children and the novels. Kind of seems you are thinking I’m a Clerith shipper who doesn’t view that Tifa and Cloud are living under on house together in separate rooms. Which I wasn’t. I more thinking about Rebirth and Cloud’s and Aerith’s interactions. That whole ‘like-like’ speech I have read shippers dissecting that scene to no end. Also the ‘dream date’ being hotly debated as a Zack dream date when we know that Nojima loves to reference previous written scenes, like a lot and there really isn’t any hidden meaning to it. I hope we can all agree that the dream date was mostly a set up to display how choices don’t matter against fate.
The dream date being laced with references to Zack isn't pointless, this is an important moment, not some random sidequest. Any writer worth their salt doesn't just put things in a story "just because," especially when it's in a scene this important.

I don't think it's Aerith being delusional or anything, but it certainly isn't a coincidence that there are so many similarities between the dream date and her date with Zack in Crisis Core.

This right here. The game isn't necessarily a romance game persay, but the romantic sub-plot exists and is a key element to Clouds character and it's specifically there with Tifas character.
See here's the thing though, it actually kinda is.

Take Tifa out of Final Fantasy 7 and literally everything changes. First off the story changes completely but most importantly, take Tifa away from the story and everything interesting about our main character effectively vanishes.

And like I've said before, if your main character is uninteresting, you might as well give up writing the story before you even start.
 

LunarTarotGirl

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Lunarae
Yep. And I’m done. Goodnight folks. Thanks for explaining to me how storytelling works.
Why are you responding as if that this is somehow an offense when it isn't? Yes the cut away to Zack in the church does mean something. There are also Stamp dogs around the area which are there for a reason.
Nothing in a game is ever done "coincidentally".

This doesn't 100% mean no that they were saying oh Aerith is just forcing Cloud into Zack's role or anything.

But it's still there for some reason and we can discuss why.
 

Hellenic

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Hellenic
See here's the thing though, it actually kinda is.

Take Tifa out of Final Fantasy 7 and literally everything changes. First off the story changes completely but most importantly, take Tifa away from the story and everything interesting about our main character effectively vanishes.

And like I've said before, if your main character is uninteresting, you might as well give up writing the story before you even start
That's what i basically implied with pointing out it's a key element to Clouds character.

Without Tifa being the trigger that she was to Cloud, he would never have had any of his story here to begin with. I just didn't really elaborate on it, but you gave the follow up.

I don't know about him not being interesting even without that story though. There certainly would be other ways to make his character interesting i'm sure, but this is the route they chose to go with it.
 
Last edited:

Ryushikaze

Deus Admiral Parsimonious, PHD, DDS, MD, JD, OBE
AKA
Tim, Ryu
Here a problem … you are assuming by me saying it’s ambiguous narrative that I’m talking about Advent Children and the novels.
I did not assume you meant those, but they are part of the overall narrative. But even before getting to those the narrative is fairly clear cut.

Kind of seems you are thinking I’m a Clerith shipper who doesn’t view that Tifa and Cloud are living under on house together in separate rooms. Which I wasn’t.
I wasn't assuming you had any particular shipping druthers. You just said the narrative was ambiguous and this is the thread where we discuss the question of Cloud's feelings of romance as it relates to the narrative. So I addressed Cloud's romance as it relates to the narrative.

I more thinking about Rebirth and Cloud’s and Aerith’s interactions. That whole ‘like-like’ speech I have read shippers dissecting that scene to no end. Also the ‘dream date’ being hotly debated as a Zack dream date when we know that Nojima loves to reference previous written scenes, like a lot and there really isn’t any hidden meaning to it. I hope we can all agree that the dream date was mostly a set up to display how choices don’t matter against fate.
The dream date is literally classed as part of Zack's story in the game's internal logic. Setting the game to skip his segments skips that date. It contains references to Zack's date with Aerith, and she has slipups like referring to the church as "Our place" which was what it was for Zack and Aeirht, but not Cloud and Aerith. Yes, it's very much about inevitability, but it's also about Aerith sorting out her feelings and if I may be so bold, saying she can't fight hers for Zack any more than she can fight fate, no matter how much she might want to be try and move on.

Like, by Aerith's own words in OG and Retrilogy, the Zack in Cloud is what first drew her to him. The strange similarities. So even though consciously, rationally, she wants to move on from a man she hasn't seen in five years and on some level knows is dead, she just can't.
 

Hellenic

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Hellenic
Pretty much the devs say the scenes are slightly removed from the story but they show Clouds bonds with each member correctly. High affinity seems to be what Cloud would be with each person and side missions i would count as canon since the game references them even if you never did them.
Yeah the quests definitely have canonity to them, as we clearly saw with the likes of all the side characters that continue their arcs here like for example Kyrie, Leslie, Jules and the flower talk followup with Aerith.

Tons of others too so no interaction is meaningless. The dates are more on the hypothetical scenarios, but they still reflect how Cloud would be with each character in that situation.
 

Ryushikaze

Deus Admiral Parsimonious, PHD, DDS, MD, JD, OBE
AKA
Tim, Ryu
So, the only thing keeping all the Loveless plays and the dates from being canon is that they all occur at the same time and are therefore exclusionary to each other. This is why most people have taken to referring to them as "near" canon, "true" and "real"

Hilariously, there is one game I can think of where there are in fact multiple, completely exclusionary endings, and yet all of them are canon, and that's Elder Scrolls Redguard. In universe no one is sure what or how it happened, but all of the possible endings did happen and all of their aftereffects are referenced in future games.
 

LunarTarotGirl

Pro Adventurer
AKA
Lunarae
Look, just in general. Debates are like business it's nothing personal. And you have to be fair about it. I notice this fandom and I've seen on both sides in my time has a huge problem just accepting points they don't like.

The moment it's brought up you have people who will will switch to bad faith and take the poster out of context, or misrepresent their position or bring up an irrelevant topic or other logical fallacy of choice to just not address that point. That has been my experience anyway. Your mileage may vary.

And it's just not good arguing. If you are making a claim you just need to accept there are counterclaims. And well thought out arguments address those counterclaims with their own evidence.

Just saying if you choose to participate in any argument you need to be prepared to face opposition. And I'm personally always welcoming opposition because that's how we expand our world view.

And basically the reason I like it here is because people actually do discuss things here. Whether they agree or not. Even whether I agree or not. There are conversations. There is back and forth. Ideas aren't just shut down for the hive mind. That is my observation.

I do appreciate that.

Just putting that out there.
 
Top Bottom