Yeah, mostly these days their goal is to prove Cloti isn't canon, rather than to prove anything about Clerith. It hasn't always been that way.
I'd argue it has for several people. At least their methodology, not their goal. They tried to prove Cloti couldn't be, ergo Clerith by default.
Granted, yes, they don't seem to be trying to prove C/A any longer.
My answer might make me sound like a traitor or a heretic or something, but I honestly liked SoS's essay better than the refutes posted in the CxA forums in response to it. The biggest reason why I like it? The voice. As a Clerith reading his essay, I felt no malice or insults from author to reader. He does not mock any of the counter arguments when he addresses them, just calmly presents his arguments. I felt this lacking in some of the posts I read in the SoS essay response thread at CxA, and even the thread title itself gave no respect to the essay's author. It is sad, because I can tell he put a lot effort in his work. I don't think his essay is unfair. You have to take a side in order to make an argument.
From what I saw, the majority of the thread gave the man no respect, and many maliciously accused him of a horrible bias. The irony of such statements being lost on the speakers, it seemed.
As for the News section at CxA made recently, please do not assume all of us members agree with the section description or the course of action that has taken place.
Now you've got me curious.
Addendum: Followed the link, skimmed the post. All I really read since I don't have time to get into that was that Anastar continues her practice of semantic foul play, as it were. She would like to pretend that Risque is only 'suggestive' of impropriety, but also from dictionary.com, I get this definition.
ris⋅qué [ri-skey; Fr. rees-key] Show IPA
–adjective
daringly close to indelicacy or impropriety; off-color: a risqué story.
Origin:
1865–70; < F, ptp. of risquer to risk
Synonyms:
broad, gross, indecent, ribald.
Dictionary.com Unabridged
Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2009.
Off-color, daringly close to indelicacy or impropriety. DARINGLY CLOSE.
There's also the idea that 'suggestive' means it doesn't confirm.
But I have two points, when you say something 'suggestive', it doesn't mean it didn't happen, it means you're dancing around the point of something that is there. For example, let's look at a definition "3. evocative; presented partially rather than in detail."
Secondly, when you use the 'suggestive' definition for risque, you can't use the 'risque' definition for suggestive. That's circular and thus invalid. Therefore, to use the suggestive definition of risque means you gotta use another definition of suggestive, such as 'evocative or presented partially rather in detail', which fits how risque actually gets used in the modern parlance.
Of course, this is all technically irrelevant, as risque is a translation of the original word meaning 'practically obscene' or words to that effect, so, yeah.