Every "rebuttal" to my posts has also been responded to numerous times by Clerith's.
Remember all those times I pointed out how we've done this song and dance before? The "we" there includes many a Clerith. So yes, I know. Hence why I was looking (but not hoping) for something
new and relevant.
I've heard all of your "rebuttals" before and they are completely and utterly incorrect (IMO).
In your opinion, sure. But as always, let me repeat that we do not deal in opinions here. You can go about throwing out opinions and treating them as something important in your CxA havens, but over here? We deal in facts, logic and reason. So, your opinion aside, the many times you've been refuted are not at all "completely and utterly incorrect." They're sort of the opposite of that, actually.
Do I have the time to respond to multiple posts and engage in a debate where it's 1 person versus 10?
Probably not. It does give you a convenient excuse to cherry pick what you do or don't respond to though, doesn't it? I wouldn't accuse you of such, given I know it genuinely is hard to keep up with a debate where your side has so little representation. But considering how often you ignore the same important arguments from the same three or four posters? Yeah, I guess cherry picking.
No, I don't. I simply came here to express my point-of-view and provide some food for thought, but I never expected to get the last word considering the amount of Cloti's that frequent TLS.
Why would you even want the last word? The last word is inherently meaningless, its a trophy for the petty. It does nothing to prove any one side, if anything it just proves who is stubborn enough to keep talking. And let's face it, we ALL get the award for stubbornness after all this time
As for your coming to express your point of view? You're entitled to such. Good for you. We've heard it before, but good for you for having an opinion. And you wanted to provide food for thought? You're entitled to try, but honestly how much thought do you think you're going to provoke by repeating the same old fallacies and flawed arguments we've seen before? We already thought about all that. And thus, we're entitled to point out the myriad ways in which it is rooted in flawed reasoning.
But I'd like to point this out:
There are numerous posts in numerous threads by numerous users throughout the CxA forums that have refuted Tres' LTD analysis.
As I am not a member of the CxA forums, this means literally nothing to me. I can't imagine its much better for most of the others here arguing in this thread.
He has yet to respond to numerous posts that have literally taken everything he's said and refuted it point-by-point.
Tell them to bring it here, to this thread. From what I hear, their little hidey-hole isn't conducive to debating the issue. So if Tres has refrained from going in there and dealing with their opinion, I don't blame him in the slightest.
And considering the positions, evidence, and overall approach to the debate I've seen in the past? I sincerely doubt anyone has successfully taken apart everything Tres said in his analysis in any real way. In their opinion, sure. But again, opinion means nothing here.
But just because he has faced numerous responses that he has yet to answer, I'm guessing he continues to believe Cloti is canon. The same can be said for me and my opinions.
He continues to believe Cloti is canon for all the many, varied reasons we have showed in this thread on many many occasions. And again, is he actually FACING these so called responses? Did they bring these responses here and debate them?
Just because YOU post a response to my post does NOT mean my post is invalid. It simply means you've responded to my post with your opinion. Both my post and your rebuttal are opinions, neither are fact.
No, your post is invalid because of the fuckton of ways your opinions have been shown to be wrong. I'm not even close to the originator of most of the points that have been made to refute you, I'm just reminding you they have already happened. And no, you confuse fact with opinion and vice verse. If SE genuinely said something, its fact. If you're scrounging through a third party commercial that is demonstrably WRONG in almost every way for evidence, then you're making up opinions. End of.
i hate to break it to you, but your responses (along with all other responses in this forum) are simply opinions. Your opinion is not fact. No rebuttal to my post is fact. And getting the last word does not mean you are necessarily correct, just ask Tres. Multiple users on the CxA forums have gotten the last word with him, yet I'm sure he believes their responses are invalid (even though they got the last word and he has yet to respond). Tres can say he's already refuted their points a million time and doesn't have the time to debate them, but I bet they'd say the same thing to him. Everyone is using opinions in this debate.
The only thing I can think of to respond to this at this time is pointing and laughing, but that seems TOO rude so I'll refrain.
Honestly...you seem to be rather arrogant.
Pride IS my sin, yes
And yes, I'm sure you'll play the victim and say I'm a hypocrite for insulting you after I called you out for being condescending/rude.
On the contrary, I don't actually see where you've insulted me so far in this post. And I congratulate you for stepping up and being a bit more hard nosed. You're still wrong in almost every way regarding the actual debate, but at least you've got a bit more fire behind that wrong now
But I don't know what else to call someone who thinks their rebuttals are facts instead of opinions.
Well when they use actual facts, logical chains of reasoning, Word of God statements from SE, and so on to build their rebuttals then you call them "correct" because they ARE facts. They're only opinions in your opinion, like most things pertinent to this debate
It seems that many at TLS believe that those here are the final word on the LTD (ROFL). Let me suggest getting out of your bubble. Stop thinking so highly of yourself.
Actually, whatever it seems to you, most of TLS gives less than a shit about this debate. Those of us who do still participate here just look at what evidence is available, for BOTH sides of the argument, and come to a conclusion the logical way. It so happens you don't enjoy the results, and that's too bad. Maybe you should get out of YOUR CxA bubble for something OTHER than the LTD once in a while. Then you could get all the facts and make a much more rounded assessment of TLS. Cause as long as this is all you're seeing? Its not only just your opinion of us, its a worthless opinion at that.
Every single thing you posted in your "rebuttal" I have a response to.
Let me ask, is it something NEW? Or is it just rephrasing the same four sentences over and over and pretending that somehow counts as new evidence? Cause if that's the case, then no you don't have a damn thing, like usual.
But considering how you've treated me, you are simply not worth my time.
Code for "I got nothin" if ever I saw such.
Call this an easy way out,
I already did. In fact I called it before you even suggested it, in a veiled way.
but I never expected to get the last word in this thread
Go ahead, post another response to me. Just one word, which I will not respond to. You can have the last word with ME if not the entire thread. Then I will silently sit back... and laugh at how meaningless getting the last word is
considering this is a Cloti paradise.
And so you know, I often prefer Cluffie
Cloti is canon, it doesn't have to be what everybody here loves the mostest. Take off your shipper goggles and see the light of "enjoy the pairing whether it happened for realz or not." It works.
Just know that everything that has been said in this forum and on this site has been responded to and refuted -- sometimes in places that are not viewable to the public at large.
Responded to, maybe. Albeit if so, some of it has NEVER been responded to HERE where we could see it and respond again. Refuted? I doubt it. If it genuinely refutes even a crumb of what we've collectively shown you over the course of this debate, why hide it in a place that "isn't viewable to the public at large?" Because it doesn't actually refute anything unless you drink the kool-aid and wear the pink glasses? Yeah, I figured
So, guys, let me know if BB ever does say anything I haven't read a thousand times before. I'll happily look into it then. Otherwise, its so much white noise and echoes.
Edit:
do we know what Marlene's sins are yet?
No word on this, despite my outright demanding an answer to this question of yours Q. Methinks its because there is no answer to be had, and thus the only way to pretend it doesn't matter is to pretend the question doesn't exist. So, BB, ignore me and my big ol' mean Cloti words if you like. But since Q is hardly ever anything but civil until driven to rudeness by extremes of dishonest, spineless, dickish practices... why ignore her? Answer the question or admit you cannot.